Page 1 of 1
Kerja Kosong Asp.net/vb.net Programmer / Sql 2005 Dba
#1
Posted 06 July 2006 - 08:06 AM
I'm setting up team to develop high performance/ high availability enterprise web application using .net 2.0 / sql 2005
I'm looking for a SMART or GOOD asp.net/vb.net 2.0 developer for a 3 months contract job (some of you will be retain for a much longer period)
(part time position is also available but only to a damn good/hardcore developer)
i will be the architect/team lead, refer to http://www.mindhives...s.com/cv/hairul
anybody who want to UPGRADE their software development career/skill, i think this is a good opportunity
please send your cv to hairul@mindhivesolutions.com and answer these questions
1. where is the fun of being a programmer? or why do you like programming?
2. what is the most difficult piece of function/module you have ever written and why?
it will be an advantage if you know how to write proper business spec, technical spec, test case
regards,
hairul akmal
I'm looking for a SMART or GOOD asp.net/vb.net 2.0 developer for a 3 months contract job (some of you will be retain for a much longer period)
(part time position is also available but only to a damn good/hardcore developer)
i will be the architect/team lead, refer to http://www.mindhives...s.com/cv/hairul
anybody who want to UPGRADE their software development career/skill, i think this is a good opportunity
please send your cv to hairul@mindhivesolutions.com and answer these questions
1. where is the fun of being a programmer? or why do you like programming?
2. what is the most difficult piece of function/module you have ever written and why?
it will be an advantage if you know how to write proper business spec, technical spec, test case
regards,
hairul akmal
#5
Posted 06 July 2006 - 01:28 PM
there are other factors in language/technology selection .. based on my situation, i decided to use vb.net
boleh explain more about how c# is better than vb.net in term of
1. lebih OO
2. separation between layer lebih memberansangkan
i would love to read your feedback
boleh explain more about how c# is better than vb.net in term of
1. lebih OO
2. separation between layer lebih memberansangkan
i would love to read your feedback
#6
Posted 06 July 2006 - 02:42 PM
QUOTE(penabiru @ Jul 6 2006, 01:28 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
there are other factors in language/technology selection .. based on my situation, i decided to use vb.net
boleh explain more about how c# is better than vb.net in term of
1. lebih OO
2. separation between layer lebih memberansangkan
i would love to read your feedback
boleh explain more about how c# is better than vb.net in term of
1. lebih OO
2. separation between layer lebih memberansangkan
i would love to read your feedback
Bagi aku syntax C# ni sendiri lebih sesuai utk konsep OO.
Contoh byk penggunaan shortform/symbol contoh : utk inherintance. Penggunaan Property (sgt penting dlm OO) lebih clear dlm C#, dlm vb.net property hampir sama dgn method yg lain sprt 'method()', yg membezakan hanya perkataan Property. Dgn menggunakan short form penggunaan generics, collection lebih mudah dijalan kan dgn loc yg lebih ringkas.
Dr segi resource contoh dr internet most of the sample, tutorial dlm bahasa C#. Dan new .NET technology lazim nya dimulai dlm C# dahulu. Flexibility nya boleh dijalan kan dimana2 sprt Linux, OSX, apache server dgn ada nya mono, vb.net masih belum di implement dlm mono. Dan kelebihan lain C# boleh interact dgn unmanaged code dan hardware.
#7
Posted 06 July 2006 - 03:21 PM
QUOTE(penabiru @ Jul 6 2006, 01:28 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
there are other factors in language/technology selection .. based on my situation, i decided to use vb.net
boleh explain more about how c# is better than vb.net in term of
1. lebih OO
2. separation between layer lebih memberansangkan
i would love to read your feedback
boleh explain more about how c# is better than vb.net in term of
1. lebih OO
2. separation between layer lebih memberansangkan
i would love to read your feedback
Actually there's not much different.. it is only the preference language of choice.
If you come from a vb6 and its predecessors' world most likely you wuold want a low learning curve to get started with a .NET language. That's where VB.NET suits well. If you are from a C++,C,Java background, most notably u would take up C# for your future career investment.. This also can lower your learning curve. In .NET it is a matter of choice...
#8
Posted 06 July 2006 - 04:02 PM
QUOTE(ron @ Jul 6 2006, 02:42 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Bagi aku syntax C# ni sendiri lebih sesuai utk konsep OO.
Contoh byk penggunaan shortform/symbol contoh : utk inherintance. Penggunaan Property (sgt penting dlm OO) lebih clear dlm C#, dlm vb.net property hampir sama dgn method yg lain sprt 'method()', yg membezakan hanya perkataan Property. Dgn menggunakan short form penggunaan generics, collection lebih mudah dijalan kan dgn loc yg lebih ringkas.
Dr segi resource contoh dr internet most of the sample, tutorial dlm bahasa C#. Dan new .NET technology lazim nya dimulai dlm C# dahulu. Flexibility nya boleh dijalan kan dimana2 sprt Linux, OSX, apache server dgn ada nya mono, vb.net masih belum di implement dlm mono. Dan kelebihan lain C# boleh interact dgn unmanaged code dan hardware.
Contoh byk penggunaan shortform/symbol contoh : utk inherintance. Penggunaan Property (sgt penting dlm OO) lebih clear dlm C#, dlm vb.net property hampir sama dgn method yg lain sprt 'method()', yg membezakan hanya perkataan Property. Dgn menggunakan short form penggunaan generics, collection lebih mudah dijalan kan dgn loc yg lebih ringkas.
Dr segi resource contoh dr internet most of the sample, tutorial dlm bahasa C#. Dan new .NET technology lazim nya dimulai dlm C# dahulu. Flexibility nya boleh dijalan kan dimana2 sprt Linux, OSX, apache server dgn ada nya mono, vb.net masih belum di implement dlm mono. Dan kelebihan lain C# boleh interact dgn unmanaged code dan hardware.
if i want to switch to C# the decision is mainly because of performance, since vb.net always add extra line after compiled to IL
talking about business decision, i bound to these factors
1. resource availability, easier to get good vb.net developer than c#
2. cost, c# developer is more expensive
3. client preference
4. existing resource
my company main business is developing web based application, thus c# ability to interact with unmanage code and more hardware is not a factor for me
so for this project, it will be vb.net / asp.net 2.0 / ajax / sql 2005
#9
Posted 06 July 2006 - 04:15 PM
QUOTE(penabiru @ Jul 6 2006, 04:02 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
talking about business decision, i bound to these factors
1. resource availability, easier to get good vb.net developer than c#
2. cost, c# developer is more expensive
3. client preference
4. existing resource
1. resource availability, easier to get good vb.net developer than c#
2. cost, c# developer is more expensive
3. client preference
4. existing resource
Yes i agree with u, nowdays especially in Malaysia is hard to find experience C# programmer/engineer even though the job advertised in star, utusan and others.
#10
Posted 06 July 2006 - 05:19 PM
QUOTE(penabiru @ Jul 6 2006, 04:02 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
if i want to switch to C# the decision is mainly because of performance, since vb.net always add extra line after compiled to IL
talking about business decision, i bound to these factors
1. resource availability, easier to get good vb.net developer than c#
2. cost, c# developer is more expensive
3. client preference
4. existing resource
my company main business is developing web based application, thus c# ability to interact with unmanage code and more hardware is not a factor for me
so for this project, it will be vb.net / asp.net 2.0 / ajax / sql 2005
talking about business decision, i bound to these factors
1. resource availability, easier to get good vb.net developer than c#
2. cost, c# developer is more expensive
3. client preference
4. existing resource
my company main business is developing web based application, thus c# ability to interact with unmanage code and more hardware is not a factor for me
so for this project, it will be vb.net / asp.net 2.0 / ajax / sql 2005
Agreed. Unless you are doing device drivers written in .NET or as such needed Win32 API calls, or some low level calls, then stick with what you have. Besides, for most business applications, VB.NET suits well...
#11
Posted 06 July 2006 - 07:19 PM
QUOTE(jEmBaLanG @ Jul 6 2006, 05:19 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Agreed. Unless you are doing device drivers written in .NET or as such needed Win32 API calls, or some low level calls, then stick with what you have. Besides, for most business applications, VB.NET suits well...
wei jembalang tanah,
aku start pegi project office everyday start next week, aku park kat bkt jalil, so bila bila ko tak busy, boleh teh tarik kat area tpm ..contact me next week, murni start masuk uitm fulltime this weekend.. aku loner sekarang
#12
Posted 06 July 2006 - 09:22 PM
QUOTE(penabiru @ Jul 6 2006, 07:19 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
wei jembalang tanah,
aku start pegi project office everyday start next week, aku park kat bkt jalil, so bila bila ko tak busy, boleh teh tarik kat area tpm ..contact me next week, murni start masuk uitm fulltime this weekend.. aku loner sekarang
aku start pegi project office everyday start next week, aku park kat bkt jalil, so bila bila ko tak busy, boleh teh tarik kat area tpm ..contact me next week, murni start masuk uitm fulltime this weekend.. aku loner sekarang
ok mat roger.
Page 1 of 1

Sign In
Register
Help


MultiQuote